A health watchdog
with responsibility for protecting NHS whistleblowers has asked at least
six employees to sign confidentiality agreements that stop them from
criticising the organisation publicly.
The Care
Quality Commission (CQC) asked the six, who have received "special
severance payments" since 2009, to sign a contract. The contracts
contain a promise that they would not "make or repeat any statement
which disparages or is intended to disparage the goodwill or reputation
of the CQC or any Specified Person".
The
disclosure has alarmed one member of the House of Commons' public
accounts committee, which will question Cynthia Bower, the CQC boss on
Wednesday.
Stephen Barclay, the Conservative MP
for Cambridge North East, said: "It is odd that a body that is supposed
to be helping whistleblowers should be seeking to impose gagging orders.
The CQC has been riven with problems and a more open attitude towards
its employees may help to improve it. The organisation that should be
encouraging openness in the NHS should not be using gagging clauses to
silence its own employees from making points in the public interest."
The
news emerged in a parliamentary question put down by Barclay. The
Department of Health confirmed that two people received special
severance payments in 2011, three in 2010 and one in 2009, payments that
totalled around £100,000. The department launched an
inquiry into the CQC
last November over alleged failures that could have risked patient
care. It coincided with inquiries from the National Audit Office and the
public accounts committee.
One
of the first acts at the commission under Bower's leadership was the
disbanding of the investigations team. The decision caused consternation
among NHS officials, who feared that failing to expose and publicise
examples of poor care would encourage complacency.
A
CQC spokeswoman said that the confidentiality agreements for the six
employees were put forward because staff were often privy to
confidential information about patients and providers.
"The
terms of CQC's severance agreements are not intended to and do not in
fact prohibit former employees from talking about the CQC and their work
for it in general terms or participating in public inquiries connected
to their work for CQC.
"It should also be noted
that compromise agreements are widespread and commonly used in both the
public and private sectors where contentious issues arise in respect of
employment issues. Any suggestion that CQC's compromise agreements could
prevent whistle-blowing would be a dramatic misrepresentation of the
facts," she said.
Rajeev Syal
The Guardian, Tue 24 Jan 2012 20.13 GMT
From the Guardian, to view please follow this link: http://m.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jan/24/care-quality-commission-gagging-orders?cat=society&type=article